Portal de Torre Pacheco
www.portaldetorrepacheco.com
First, the concessionaire does not want to stop providing the service and does not leave the management of the service for the moment, but it is an imminent question that will be presented sooner rather than later, since if there is no change in the circumstances, the company will not Can maintain the current situation, the deficit is exorbitant.
It is not a blackmail, it is a cause-effect relationship.
The concessionaire does not enter to qualify or disqualify objective facts.
Neither to assess the statements of the municipal spokesmen, although it is worth noting that it is said that the expenses claimed have been audited negatively, without the concessionary being aware of the notification of such inspection, which is not surprising.
The complaints that have been filed have already been filed before the Court and not for the express rejection of the claims of the company but for the silence produced by not receiving a response to the briefs filed in 2015 and 2016, corresponding to items such as quoting a Example, water consumption of the City that paid improperly the concessionaire company.
That silence is due to the lack of diligence of the City Council that continues being the holder of the service and should be interested and resolve the incidents that occur in the execution of the contract.
What really needs to worry the neighbors is that the City does not have an economic report on the cost of maintaining the service and its viability both through public and private management, therefore, it is difficult to choose what is the best way to Manage these centers.
The local government has decided that it has decided arbitrarily and unilaterally, without any kind of report to study the possible effects, not even informing the concessionaire beforehand, to modify the public prices for this course, altering substantially The circumstances taken into account for the conclusion of the contract.
For this reason, and for the amounts due that have not been paid, it becomes impossible for the concessionaire to continue with the provision of the service.
The municipal administration can not urge the fulfillment of the contract having previously breached it.
The concessionaire, informing of the impossibility of continuing to provide the service, requested the termination of the contract as early as October 2016. In addition, the concessionaire held meetings in the municipal offices, transferring their concerns and the difficulty of the company to continue with The management of the service under the conditions produced by the Administration.
However, the City Council did not inform anyone or take any measure whatsoever.
Source: Grupo Cativos
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies