Portal de Torre Pacheco

www.portaldetorrepacheco.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

IU-Greens in the city of Torre Pacheco has presented a set of arguments to the proposed 2014 municipal budget, which was approved in original form March 13.

Allegations reported inclusion of credit necessary to fulfill due obligations to the local authority;

insufficient income relative to the budgeted expenses, and failure to adjust its production to established legal procedures.

The spokesman of the training at the Guildhall, Francisco Ramón Martínez, has indicated that the budget "goes against the law and affects the serious financial situation of the municipality."

Martinez has said that the accounts presented pose a greater injury to the local treasury as a result of "several legal violations and possible financial implications."

In addition, he stated that perpetuate a debt it difficult for providers to charge on time and bills are paid without prior recognition, which could lead to irregularities.

He also emphasized that the budget does not provide for income and costs of water management.

"These items must be included in the accounts as payments by municipal water service rates are regulated by the City and therefore revenue constitutional imperative that must be registered."

The mayor stressed that the budget appropriation for the service of security, surveillance and access control is "so poor" that misses to the four recognized extrajudicially bills in Parliament last month.

In this regard, he stated that "the Court of Auditors and noted several irregularities in the municipal budget this game in its latest report."

On the revenue in relation to budgeted expenditure, Martinez has indicated that IU-Green has argued that municipal auditor's report does not indicate the basis used to calculate revenue.

"Neither allows comparison with what actually collected in the last year by not including the settlement of 2013 on the file of the budget, precluding objective assessment of the numbers."

Also, IU-Greens criticized the record of the accounts do not include prescriptive documents and leaves are not numbered the same, plus they have passed out of time, preventing participation.

Source: IURM